Between releases there are lots of changes made to improve security and we've not listed everything; just a high-level overview of the things we think are most interesting that help mitigate security risk. We could go into much more detail, breaking out the number of daemons covered by the SELinux default policy, the number of binaries compiled PIE, and so on.

Note that this table is for the most common architectures, x86 and x86_64 only; other supported architectures may vary.

Features	Red Hat Enterprise Linux
	3	4	5	6
	2003 Oct	2005 Feb	2007 Mar	2010 Nov
Firewall by default	Y	Y	Y	Y
Signed updates required by default	Y	Y	Y	Y
NX emulation using segment limits by default	Y(since 9/2004)	Y	Y	Y
Support for Position Independent Executables (PIE)	Y(since 9/2004)	Y	Y	Y
Address Randomization (ASLR) for Stack/mmap by default	Y (since 9/2004)	Y	Y	Y
ASLR for vDSO (if vDSO enabled)	no vDSO	Y	Y	Y
Support for NULL pointer dereference protection	Y(since 11/2009)	Y(since 9/2009)	Y(since 5/2008)	Y
NX for supported processors/kernels by default	Y(since 9/2004)	Y	Y	Y
Support for block module loading via cap-bound sysctl tunable or /proc/sys/kernel/cap-bound	Y	Y	Y	no cap-bound
Restricted access to kernel memory by default		Y	Y	Y
Support for SELinux		Y	Y	Y
SELinux enabled with targeted policy by default		Y	Y	Y
glibc heap/memory checks by default		Y	Y	Y
Support for FORTIFY_SOURCE, used on selected packages		Y	Y	Y
Support for ELF Data Hardening		Y	Y	Y
All packages compiled using FORTIFY_SOURCE			Y	Y
All packages compiled with stack smashing protection			Y	Y
SELinux Executable Memory Protection			Y	Y
glibc pointer encryption by default			Y	Y
Enabled NULL pointer dereference protection by default			Y(since 5/2008)	Y
Enabled write-protection for kernel read-only data structures by default			Y	Y
FORTIFY_SOURCE extensions including C++ coverage				Y
Support for block module loading via modules_disabled sysctl tunable or /proc/sys/kernel/modules_disabled				Y
Support for SELinux to restrict the loading of kernel modules by unprivileged processes in confined domains				Y
Enabled kernel -fstack-protector buffer overflow detection by default				Y
Support for sVirt labelling to provide security over guest instances				Y
Support for SELinux to confine users' access on a system				Y
Support for SELinux to test untrusted content via a sandbox				Y
Support for SELinux X Access Control Extension (XACE)				Y

Starting with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 we have switched to using SHA-256 signatures on all RPM packages and to a 4096-bit RSA signing key.

We've done this because it is current best practice to migrate away from MD5 and SHA-1 hashes due to various flaws found in them. Those flaws don't yet directly pose a threat to package signing however, and therefore our existing shipped products which used these older hashes will continue to use their existing keys until they reach their end of life.

A similar switch to stronger signing was already made in Fedora 11. This switch involved some changes to the RPM application.

So what this means is that we used new signing keys for both the beta and final release packages for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6. Those keys were created and are protected by a hardware security module, as we've done with previous keys.

Details and fingerprint of the new key, #fd431d51.

Also in the Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 distribution we've started to simplify the layout of the key files in the /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/ directory:

• RPM-GPG-KEY-redhat-beta : Both the old and new beta keys
• RPM-GPG-KEY-redhat-release : Both the new signing key and the auxiliary key
• RPM-GPG-KEY-redhat-legacy-release : The signing key used for EL5
• RPM-GPG-KEY-redhat-legacy-former : The signing key used for products before EL5
• RPM-GPG-KEY-redhat-legacy-rhx : The signing key used for RHX

The auxiliary key mentioned above is for emergency use. We created it some time ago on a new standalone machine, took a hardcopy printout of the private key and passphrase, stored them separately and securely, and destroyed the software copies. We've planned for many eventualities, but in the unlikely event we lose the ability to sign with the hardware key we could retrieve the printout, type in the key, and continue to sign updates.

For our first wedding aniversary this weekend my lovely wife bought me a new gadget, an Akai MPK-25 midi keyboard. The last Sonik gig that I played at we used full-sized midi keyboards hooked to real synth modules, but for our next gig later this year we want to move to lightweight with all soft-syths. Our 140bpm tracks are too hard to play completely live, so a 2-octave keyboard is perfectly fine for playing a lead line, and the keyboard has these great touch pads for triggering samples. We like triggering samples, see the latest video on our facebook page.

We've been setting up our perfect performance environment on a laptop, using Fedora 13 as the base OS, but with a real-time kernel and some prebuilt packages from the Planet CCRMA repository.

Tracy wasn't sure if the keyboard was going to work okay in Linux and didn't find any useful information with Google, even looking for it's USB ID (09e8:0072). Fortunately the Akai MPK-25 is class compliant and works perfectly with Fedora 13 without needing to configure or install anything at all. It's even happy to be powered from just the laptop USB port cutting down on cables and adaptors.

$ aconnect -i
client 0: 'System' [type=kernel]
    0 'Timer           '
    1 'Announce        '
client 14: 'Midi Through' [type=kernel]
    0 'Midi Through Port-0'
client 16: 'Akai MPK25' [type=kernel]
    0 'Akai MPK25 MIDI 1'
    1 'Akai MPK25 MIDI 2'
    2 'Akai MPK25 MIDI 3'
$ aconnect -o
client 14: 'Midi Through' [type=kernel]
    0 'Midi Through Port-0'
client 16: 'Akai MPK25' [type=kernel]
    0 'Akai MPK25 MIDI 1'
    1 'Akai MPK25 MIDI 2'

When using USB, the midi in and out connectors on the back become extra interfaces you can use too, those extra ports you can see shown above -- so we can have another keyboard and a sound module connected through the Akai to the laptop and save a midi interface.

I'll cover the software we're using for our live gigs in a later article; aside from the actual synth VST modules we use all open source.

The Red Hat SRT is looking for another member to investigate, triage, and respond to security vulnerabilities in Red Hat Enterprise Linux but also across other products and services. You'll join our diverse and enthusiastic team currently spread across eight different countries.

Sound interesting? See the full job description: Security Response Team Software Engineer. If you are interested please use the online application process.

Although the location is specified as the Czech Republic there is actually no specific restriction on the location of this position, and if you're right for the role you could be located at your nearest local world-wide Red Hat office, or possibly even remote.

Errata count

The chart below illustrates the total number of security updates issued for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Server if you had installed 5.4, up to and including the 5.5 release, broken down by severity. I've split it into two columns, one for the packages you'd get if you did a default install, and the other if you installed every single package (which is unlikely as it would involve a bit of manual effort to select every one). For a given installation, the number of package updates and vulnerabilities that affected you will depend on exactly what you have installed or removed.

So for a default install, from release of 5.4 up to and including 5.5, we shipped 52 advisories to address 140 vulnerabilities. 5 advisories were rated critical, 14 were important, and the remaining 33 were moderate and low.

Or, for all packages, from release of 5.4 to and including 5.5, we shipped 75 advisories to address 187 vulnerabilities. 6 advisories were rated critical, 18 were important, and the remaining 51 were moderate and low.

Critical vulnerabilities

The 6 critical advisories were for 3 different packages. Given the nature of the flaws, ExecShield protections in RHEL5 should make exploiting the memory flaws harder.

1. Four updates to Firefox (September 2009, October 2009, December 2009, February 2010) where a malicious web site could potentially run arbitrary code as the user running Firefox.
2. An update to kdelibs (November 2009), where a malicious web site could potentially run arbitrary code as the user running the Konqueror browser. kdelibs is not a default installation package.
3. An update to krb5, the Kerberos network authentication system (January 2010), where a remote KDC client could cause a crash or run arbitrary code as root. This issue only affected users that have configured and enabled krb5.

Updates to correct 24 out of the 25 critical vulnerabilities were available via Red Hat Network either the same day, or up to one calendar day after the issues were public. The update to fix Konqueror took us 4 calendar days.

Overall, for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 since release to date, 98% of critical vulnerabilities have had an update available to address them available from the Red Hat Network either the same day or the next calendar day after the issue was public.

Other significant vulnerabilities

Red Hat Enterprise Linux since 5.2 contained backported patches from the upstream Linux kernel to add the ability to restrict unprivileged mapping of low memory, designed to mitigate NULL pointer dereference flaws. In the last risk report we mentioned it was found that this protection was not sufficient, as a system with SELinux enabled was more permissive in allowing local users in the unconfined_t domain to map low memory areas even if the mmap_min_addr restriction is enabled. This is CVE-2009-2695 and was addressed in a kernel update in November 2009.

Previous updates

To compare these statistics with previous update releases we need to take into account that the time between each update is different. So looking at a default installation and calculating the number of advisories per month gives the results illustrated by the following chart:

This data is interesting to get a feel for the risk of running Enterprise Linux 5 Server, but isn't really useful for comparisons with other versions, distributions, or operating systems -- for example, a default install of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4AS did not include Firefox, but 5 Server does. You can use our public security measurement data and tools, and run your own custom metrics for any given Red Hat product, package set, timescales, and severity range of interest.

See also: 5.3 to 5.4, 5.2 to 5.3, 5.1 to 5.2, and 5.0 to 5.1 risk reports.

During the creation and review of the list we spent some time to see how closely last years list matched the types of flaws we deal with at Red Hat. We first looked at all the issues that Red Hat fixed across our entire product portfolio in the 2009 calendar year and filtered out those that had the highest severity. All our 2009 vulnerabilities have CVSS scores, so we filtered on those that have a CVSS base score of 7.0 or above^[1].

There were 22 vulnerabilities that matched, and we mapped each one to the most appropriate CWE. This gives us 11 flaw types which led to the most severe flaws affecting Red Hat in 2009:

CWE	CWE Description	CWE/SANS top 25?	Number of Vulnerabilities
CWE-476	NULL Pointer Dereference	No (on cusp)	6
CWE-120	Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input	Yes	3
CWE-129	Improper Validation of Array Index	Yes	3
CWE-131	Incorrect Calculation of Buffer Size	Yes	3
CWE-78	OS Command Injection	Yes	1
CWE-285	Improper Access Control (Authorization)	Yes	1
CWE-362	Race Condition	Yes	1
CWE-330	Use of Insufficiently Random Values	No (on cusp)	1
CWE-590	Free of Memory not on the Heap	No	1
CWE-672	Use of a Resource after Expiration or Release	No (on cusp)	1
CWE-772	Missing Release of Resource after Effective Lifetime	No (on cusp)	1

10 of the 11 CWE are mentioned in the 2010 CWE/SANS document, although 4 of them are on "the cusp" and didn't make it into the top 25.

This quick review shows us that 2009 was the year of the kernel NULL pointer dereference flaw, as they could allow local untrusted users to gain privileges, and several public exploits to do just that were released. For Red Hat, interactions with SELinux prevented them being able to be easily mitigated, until the end of the year when we provided updates. Now, in 2010, the upstream Linux kernel and many vendors ship with protections to prevent kernel NULL pointers leading to privilege escalation. So although 2009 was the year where CWE-476 mattered to Linux administrators, it didn't make the SANS/CWE top 25 as this flaw type should not lead to severe issues (as long as the protections remain sufficient).

Here is a breakdown with the complete data set to show the CVSS scores and packages affected:

CVE	CWE	top 25?	CVSS base	Fixed in
CVE-2008-5182	CWE-362	Yes	7.2	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 (kernel)
CVE-2009-0065	CWE-129	Yes	8.3	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4,5,MRG (kernel)
CVE-2009-0692	CWE-120	Yes	8.3	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3,4 (dhcp)
CVE-2009-0778	CWE-772	No (on cusp)	7.1	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 (kernel)
CVE-2009-0846	CWE-590	No	9.3	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 2.1, 3 (krb5) [2]
CVE-2009-1185	CWE-131	Yes	7.2	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 (udev)
CVE-2009-1385	CWE-129	Yes	7.1	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3,4,5,MRG (kernel)
CVE-2009-1439	CWE-131	Yes	7.1	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4,5,MRG (kernel)
CVE-2009-1579	CWE-78	Yes	7.5	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3,4,5 (squirrelmail)
CVE-2009-1633	CWE-131	Yes	7.1	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4,5,MRG (kernel)
CVE-2009-2406	CWE-120	Yes	7.2	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 (kernel)
CVE-2009-2407	CWE-120	Yes	7.2	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 (kernel)
CVE-2009-2692	CWE-476	No (on cusp)	7.2	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3,4,5,MRG (kernel)
CVE-2009-2694	CWE-129	Yes	7.5	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3,4,5 (pidgin)
CVE-2009-2698	CWE-476	No (on cusp)	7.2	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3,4,5 (kernel)
CVE-2009-2848	CWE-672	No (on cusp)	7.2	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3,4,5,MRG (kernel)
CVE-2009-2908	CWE-476	No (on cusp)	7.2	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 (kernel)
CVE-2009-3238	CWE-330	No (on cusp)	7.8	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4,5,MRG (kernel)
CVE-2009-3290	CWE-285	Yes	7.2	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 (kvm)
CVE-2009-3547	CWE-476	No (on cusp)	7.2	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3,4,5,MRG (kernel)
CVE-2009-3620	CWE-476	No (on cusp)	7.2	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4,5,MRG (kernel)
CVE-2009-3726	CWE-476	No (on cusp)	7.2	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5,MRG (kernel)

[1] NIST NVD rate vulnerabilities as "High" severity if they have a CVSS base score of 7.0-10.0. This ends up excluding flaws in web browsers such as Firefox which can have a maximum CVSS base score of 6.8.

[2] Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 and 5 were also affected by this vulnerability, but with a lower CVSS base score of 4.3, due to the extra runtime pointer checking.

The stories center around how open source software such as Firefox was able to produce updates to correct this issue just a few days after the Blackhat conference, while Microsoft still hasn't fixed it and are "investigating a possible vulnerability in Windows presented during Black Hat".

But the actual timeline is missing from these stories.

The NULL character certificate flaw (CVE-2009-2408) was actually disclosed by two researchers working independantly who both happened to present the work at the same conference, Blackhat, in July this year. Dan Kaminsky mentioned it as part of a series of PKI flaws he disclosed. Marlinspike had found the same flaw, but was able to demonstrate it in practice by managing to get a trusted Certificate Authority to sign such a malicious certificate.

The flaw was no Blackhat surprise; Dan Kaminsky actually found this issue many months ago and responsibly reported the issues to vendors including Red Hat, Microsoft, and Mozilla. We found out about this issue on 25th February 2009 and worked with Dan and some of the upstream projects on these issues in advance, so we had plenty of time to prepare updates and this is why we were able to have them ready to release just after the disclosure.

We keep all our friends and family contacts in a single text file in vCard format. We sync this file to our phones (mobile and house DECT phones) and home automation system (for caller ID and phone book). I also print out a copy to take when travelling. Except I rarely print out an update as I've failed to find any useful program to pretty print the contacts. Previously I used a quick hack script in perl to convert the vcard entries to HTML, but it wasn't clever enough to handle page breaks and needed manual setting all the margins and page sizes correctly. I like to print it to fit in my paper planner, a Compact size Franklin Covey planner system.

I've been using Scribus for a few months, mostly for our wedding invites and stationary, and spotted that Scribus had a Python API. So a few hours later and out has popped a Python script you can use to pretty print a vCard vcf file, handling page breaks, images, and large margins to skip the hole punches.

Here is an extract from a sample vCard file:

BEGIN:VCARD
ADR;TYPE=work:;;10 Downing Street;London;SW1A 2AA
TEL;TYPE=fax:+44 2079 250918
NICKNAME:Prime Minister
FN:Gordon Brown
N:Brown;Gordon
PHOTO;VALUE=URI:http://www.number10.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/pm-official-pic-234x300.jpg
VERSION:3.0
END:VCARD

You'll need a few things:

1. a sample vCard file or your own one
2. vcf2scribus.py script (version 1.0)
3. A recent version of Scribus. 1.3.5 works, but earlier ones will not.
4. You'll also need the python vobject library installed if you haven't already got it

Use the "Script" "Execute Script" option, find and select vcf2scribus.py and hopefully you'll end up with something like this:

You can then save it as a pdf or print it direct.

The script is a bit of a hack and has hard-coded page sizes, fonts, margins, vcard sections used, and so on. But I figure it might save someone a couple of hours and only needs a bit of modification to suit. It would be fairly easy to extend the script to use the Scribus API to let folks select the vcard file, page sizes, fonts, and things. Bonus points if you fix it to figure out the final sizes of the images and right align them. This is my second ever python program so no sniggering at the code!

Errata count

The chart below illustrates the total number of security updates issued for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Server as if you installed 5.3, up to and including the 5.4 release, broken down by severity. I've split it into two columns, one for the packages you'd get if you did a default install, and the other if you installed every single package (which is unlikely as it would involve a bit of manual effort to select every one). For a given installation, the number of package updates and vulnerabilities that affected you will depend on exactly what you have installed or removed.

So for a default install, from release of 5.3 up to and including 5.4, we shipped 51 advisories to address 166 vulnerabilities. 8 advisories were rated critical, 18 were important, and the remaining 25 were moderate and low.

Or, for all packages, from release of 5.3 to and including 5.4, we shipped 78 advisories to address 251 vulnerabilities. 9 advisories were rated critical, 28 were important, and the remaining 41 were moderate and low.

Critical vulnerabilities

The 9 critical advisories were for just 3 different packages. In all the cases below, given the nature of the flaws, ExecShield protections in RHEL5 should make exploiting these memory flaws harder.

1. Seven updates to Firefox (February, March 4th, March 27th, April 21st, April 27th, June, July ) where a malicious web site could potentially run arbitrary code as the user running Firefox.
2. An update to kdelibs (June), where a malicious web site could potentially run arbitrary code as the user running the Konqueror browser. kdelibs is not a default installation package.
3. An update to the NSS library (July), where a service could present a malicious SSL certificate causing a heap overflow which could potentially run arbitrary code as the user running a browser such as Firefox.

Updates to correct all of these critical vulnerabilities were available via Red Hat Network either the same day, or up to one calendar day after the issues were public.

In fact for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 since release and to date, every critical vulnerability has had an update available to address it available from the Red Hat Network either the same day or the next calendar day after the issue was public.

Other significant vulnerabilities

Although not in the definition of critical severity, also of interest during this period were several NULL pointer dereference kernel issues. NULL pointer dereference flaws in the Linux kernel can often be easily abused by a local unprivileged user to gain root privileges through the mapping of low memory pages and crafting them to contain valid malicious instructions:

• CVE-2009-2698 was public on August 24th and a working privilege escalation exploit was published about a week later. This issue was addressed for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 by a kernel update on August 24th.
• CVE-2009-2692 was public on August 13th and a working privilege escalation exploit was published the same day. This issue was addressed for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 by a kernel update on August 24th.
• CVE-2009-1897 was public on July 16th along with a working privilege escalation exploit. This issue affected only beta versions of the Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.4 kernel and it was addressed prior to the release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.4.

Red Hat Enterprise Linux since 5.2 has contained backported patches from the upstream Linux kernel to add the ability to restrict unprivileged mapping of low memory, designed to mitigate NULL pointer dereference flaws. However it was found that this protection was not sufficient, as a system with SELinux enabled is more permissive in allowing local users in the unconfined_t domain to map low memory areas even if the mmap_min_addr restriction is enabled. This is CVE-2009-2695 and will be addressed in a future kernel update.

Mitigations

Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 shipped with a number of security technologies designed to make it harder to exploit vulnerabilities and in some cases block exploits for certain flaw types completely. From 5.3 to 5.4 there were three flaws blocked that would otherwise have required critical updates:

• CVE-2009-0692, a stack buffer overflow flaw in dhclient. FORTIFY_SOURCE protection detects the overflow and causes dhclient to exit with no security consequence. No security update for users of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 was needed.
• CVE-2009-1252 a buffer overflow flaw in NTP caught by FORTIFY_SOURCE. We issued an update as a remote attacker could still cause a denial of service.
• CVE-2009-0846, a uninitialized pointer free in krb5. glibc provides a hardened malloc/free implementation which mitigates the exploitability of this flaw, however we issued an update as a remote attacker could still cause a denial of service.

Previous updates

To compare these statistics with previous update releases we need to take into account that the time between each update is different. So looking at a default installation and calculating the number of advisories per month gives the results illustrated by the following chart:

This data is interesting to get a feel for the risk of running Enterprise Linux 5 Server, but isn't really useful for comparisons with other versions, distributions, or operating systems -- for example, a default install of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4AS did not include Firefox, but 5 Server does. You can use our public security measurement data and tools, and run your own custom metrics for any given Red Hat product, package set, timescales, and severity range of interest.

See also: 5.2 to 5.3, 5.1 to 5.2, and 5.0 to 5.1 risk reports.

MD2 signature verification

The first issue is that many web browsers still accept certificates with MD2 hash signatures, even though MD2 is no longer considered a cryptographically strong algorithm. This could make it easier for an attacker to create a malicious certificate that would be treated as trusted by a browser. It turns out that there are not many valid MD2 hash certificates around any more, and the main one that does exist is at the trusted root level anyway (and there is actually no need for a crypto library to verify the self-signature on a trusted root). So most vendors have chosen to address this issue by disabling MD2 completely for certificate verification. This is allocated CVE name CVE-2009-2409 ( single name for all affected products).

• OpenSSL. For upstream OpenSSL we have disabled MD2 support completely. This was done in two stages; the first was a patch in June 2009 that removed the redundant check of a trusted root self-signed certificate. Then in July, MD2 was totally disabled. So this issue does not affect OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta 3 or later. Although there have not yet been an upstream release of 0.9.8 containing this fix, a future OpenSSL 0.9.8 (after 0.9.8k) will disable MD2, probably in a few weeks.

• GnuTLS. The upstream GnuTLS library has for some time meant to have disabled MD2 support, although due to a broken patch it wasn't actually disabled correctly until January 2009. So this issue does not affect GnuTLS versions 2.6.4 and above, or GnuTLS versions 2.7.4 and above.

• NSS (and hence Firefox). The upstream NSS library since version 3.12.3 (April 2009) has disabled MD2 and MD4 by default (although legacy applications could turn it back on using an environment variable "NSS_ALLOW_WEAK_SIGNATURE_ALG" if they need to). Mozilla Firefox since version 3.5 has used this NSS version and therefore MD2 is disabled. I suspect this issue will get addressed in a future Firefox 3.0 update in the future too if they rebase to the new NSS.

There is no immediate panic to address this issue as a critical security issue, as in order for it to be exploited an attacker still has to create a MD2 collision with this root certificate; something that is as of today still a significant amount of effort.

My CVSS v2 base score for CVE-2009-2409 would be 2.6 (AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N)

Differences in Common Name handling

This issue is about how Common Names are checked for validity by applications. For example if a server presents a certificate with two CN entries, how does the app validate those. Does it use the first one, the last one, or all of them?

• OpenSSL. OpenSSL provides an API that allow applications to check CN names any way they want. It turns out that, without sound guidance, applications have tended to do things differently. A summary of a few OpenSSL applications is in this Red Hat bugzilla comment. But as a CA should validate all CN names in a certificate being signing, these are really just bugs and do not have a security impact

Leading 0's in Common Name handling

The second issue is all about inconsistencies in the interpretation of subject x509 names in certificates. Specifically "issue 2b, subattack 1" is where a malicious certificate can contain leading 0's in the OID. The idea is that an attacker could add in some OID into a certificate that, when handled by the Certificate Authority, would appear to be some extension and ignored, but when handled by OpenSSL would appear to be the Common Name OID. So the attacker would present the certificate to a client application and it might think that the OID is actually a Common Name, and accept the certificate where it otherwise should not.

• OpenSSL. This is not a security issue for OpenSSL. Steve Henson explains: "OpenSSL does tolerate leading 0x80 but it does _not_ recognize this as commonName because the NID code checks for a precise match with the encoding. Attempts to print this out will never show commonName nor will attempts to look up using NID_commonName". However this will be addressed as a bug fix in the future.

• NSS (and hence Firefox). NSS is noted in the paper as having a similar issue, but again it's not fooled into treating the OID as a Common Name so this is not a security issue (and therefore I didn't check if this is already fixed in the new upstream NSS).

OID overflow in Common Name handling

"issue 2b, subattack 2" is where a malicious certificate can have a very large integer in the OID. The idea is that an attacker could add in some OID into a certificate that, when handled by the CA, would appear to be some extension and ignored, but when handled by OpenSSL would overflow and appear to be the Common Name OID. So the attacker would present the certificate to a client application using OpenSSL and it might think that the OID is actually a Common Name, and accept the certificate where it otherwise should not.

• OpenSSL. This issue was actually fixed upstream in September 2006 in OpenSSL 0.9.8d by switching to using the bignum library for handling the OID. Even for older versions though it's really not a security issue for the same reason as given earlier: the OpenSSL NID code checks for a precise match with the encoding. So attempts to print this out will never show it being a Common Name, nor will attempts to look it up as a Common Name succeed.

NULL bytes in Common Name handling

"issue 2, attack 2c" is regarding NULL terminators in a Common Name field. If an attacker is able to get a carefully-crafted certificate signed by a Certificate Authority trusted by a browser, the attacker could use the certificate during a man-in-the-middle attack and potentially confuse the browser into accepting it by mistake.

• NSS (and hence Firefox). This issue affected NSS and is assigned CVE-2009-2408. The upstream NSS library since version 3.12.3 (April 2009) has fixes to address this issue. Therefore Firefox 3.5 is not affected.

My CVSS v2 base score for CVE-2009-2408 would be 4.3 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N)

OpenSSL 'compat mode' subject name injection

"issue 2d" is how the OpenSSL command line utility will output unescaped subject X509 lines to standard output. So if some utility runs the openssl application from the command line and parses the text output, and if an attacker can craft a malicious certificate in such a way they fool a CA into signing it, they could present it to the utility and possibly fool that utility into thinking fields were different to what they actually are, perhaps allowing the certificate to be accepted as legitimate.

• OpenSSL. This attack requires that some utility will parse the output of OpenSSL command line using the default 'compat' mode. Applications should never do this. Upstream OpenSSL are unlikely to address this issue directly, although in the future the default output mode perhaps could be changed to something other than 'compat', and it's likely a documentation update will remind users that parsing the output of running such an openssl command is not the right way to use OpenSSL.

OpenSSL ASN1 printing crash

• OpenSSL. This was reported by Dan to OpenSSL and fixed in March 2009. This was allocated CVE name CVE-2009-0590. Therefore OpenSSL 0.9.8k and later contains a fix for this issue.

My CVSS v2 base score for CVE-2009-0590 would be 2.6 (AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P)

Hi! I'm Mark Cox. This blog gives my thoughts and opinions on my security work, open source, fedora, home automation, and other topics.

pics from my twitter:

popular tags: [all], apache, apachecon, apacheweek, cve, cvss, fedora, financial, geocaching, ha, metrics, microsoft, nashville, north carolina, red hat summit, redhat, security, trips